In re Morrison’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 509
Relies on East Boston Savings Bank v. Ogan · 34 Md. App. 115 - Weitz v. Marram · In Re the Medicine Shoppe · In Re Fiesole Trading Corp. · Celotex Corp. v. Allstate Insurance (In Re Celotex Corp.)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is disagreement among the courts over the interrelationship between equitable subrogation under state law and subrogation under Bankruptcy Code § 509, specifically “as to whether § 509 preempts any other form of subrogation theory, or whether equitable subrogation criteria are the test under § 509, or whether equitable subrogation is an alternative method to § 509.” In re Celotex Corp., 289 B.R. 460, 469 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2003) (citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.