Hallowell v. Keve’s Empirical Analysis
555 F.2d 103 · 1977
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently November 2010 · most notably Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Company. Federal Trade Commission v. The Superior Oil Company, Inc., a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Exxon Corporation, a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Shell Oil Company, a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Company of California, a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Mobil Oil Corporation, a Corporation (1977), Miller v. Aa Stagner Rl Freeman (1985)
23 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Fay v. Noia · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Mullaney v. Wilbur
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the trial court properly advised the jury to consider [Real’s] alibi defense along with all of the other evidence in determining whether the Commonwealth satisfied is burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that [Real] committed the offenses charged. Thus, when read in its entirety, the court’s jury instruction clearly, adequately, and accurately reflected the law. As such, [Real’s] ineffective assistance of counsel claim lacks arguable merit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Real v. Shannon“involuntary manslaughter is the unintentional “killing of another without «malice while engaged in the doing of an unlawful act, not in itself felonious or tending to do great bodily harm.” Appellant’s own testimony demonstrates that he was engaged in an unlawful act, i. e., taking a “swipe” at the victim with a knife, in itself tending to great bodily harm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he question is not whether the trial court failed to isolate and cure a particular ailing instruction, but rather whether the ailing instruction by itself so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.