Kananen v. Matthews’s Empirical Analysis
555 F.2d 667 · 1977
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 1997
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 424A (§ 224 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Belcher · Haggar Co. v. Helvering · Helvering v. Hammel · United States v. Katz · United States v. Standard Brewery, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) If for any month prior to the month in which an individual attains the age of 62: (1) such individual is entitled to benefits under section 223 of this title, and (2) such individual is entitled for such month, under a workmen’s compensation law or plan of the United States or a State, to periodic benefits for a total or partial disability (whether or not permanent), and the Secretary has, in a prior month, received notice of such entitlement for such month, the total of his benefits under section 223 of this title for such month and of any benefits under section 202 of this title for such month based on his wages and self-employment income shall be reduced (but not below zero) by the amount by which the sum of— (3) such total of benefits under section 223 and 202 of this title for such month, and (4) such periodic benefits payable (and actually paid) for such month to such individual under the workmen’s compensation law or plan, exceeds the higher of— (5) 80 per centum of his “average current earnings”, or, (6) the total of such individual’s disability insurance benefits under section 223 of this title for such month and of any monthly insurance benefits under section 202 of this title for such month based on his wages and self-employment income, prior to reduction under this section.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the committee believes that it is desirable as a matter of sound principle to prevent the payment of excessive combined benefits.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“No portion of Sec. 424a limits its application to payments for a disability caused by the same physical or mental condition”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.