United States v. Zedner’s Empirical Analysis
555 F.3d 68 · 2008
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974)
Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Mansfield Ry Co v. Swan · Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp. · Molinaro v. New Jersey · United States v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“THE COURT: So [Zedner] asked for permission to go to Israel, he was given permission to go for ... two weeks— THE COURT: ... and he bought a one-way ticket. MR. ZAS: That’s my understanding, yes. THE COURT: And couldn’t afford to buy a ticket back. MR. ZAS: That is what he has told us....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[W]e are bound by the decisions of prior panels until such time as they are overruled by an en banc panel of our Court or by the Supreme Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.