United States v. Sanchez’s Empirical Analysis
555 F.3d 910 · 2009
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Ford v. State (2009), United States v. Biglow (2009)
6 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Rawlings v. Kentucky · Michigan v. Summers · Devenpeck v. Alford · Muehler v. Mena
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“our discretion to decide [that] case under the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule” and left”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“anyone present on the premises, such as a visitor,” noting that the Court did not explain”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“merely common sense that a drug supplier will keep evidence of his crimes at his home,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.