Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 555 N.E.2d 178 - Hendricks v. State

Hendricks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 1999
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 180 Ind. App. 679 - Pillars v. State · Morrison v. State · Huffman v. State · State v. Smith · Butts v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he State must show actual delay caused by the defendant’s act before [a] time period can be charged against him.”); Commonwealth v. Morgan, 484 Pa. 117, 121-22 , 398 A.2d 972, 974 (1979) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.