555 So. 2d 1009 - Middlebrook v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably 587 So. 2d 848 - Holland v. State (1991), 568 So. 2d 687 - Cooper v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. (1990)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bates v. State Bar · Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. United States · Lascaris v. Shirley · Cole v. State · 471 So. 2d 332 - Cabello v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he mere fact that portions of such a recording are inaudible does not render it per se inadmissible. (footnote omitted). The question is whether what can be heard had probative value within Rule 401.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“We have repeatedly held an accused's remedy for tardy disclosure of that to which he was entitled in pre-trial discovery is a continuance reasonable under the circumstances.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. McCaine v. State · Dahl v. State“[a]s this Court has oft-stated: `Our criminal justice system necessarily proceeds on the premise that jurors take their responsibilities quite seriously,' and this Court `presume[s] as a matter of institutional imperative that our jurors respect the law as they are instructed by the court.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Strahan v. State · Flowers v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.