Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 555 So. 2d 1183 - Thomas v. State

555 So. 2d 1183 - Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2006
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gregory v. United States · Reavis v. Antinore · United States v. Gregory · Clark v. State · 548 So. 2d 562 - Ex Parte Hinton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'While recognizing that an accused generally has a right to be tried without being subjected to physical restraints, and that this right has been embodied in various constitutional and statutory guaranties, *Page 967 the courts have also recognized that this right is subject to exception, especially on such grounds as the need to prevent (1) the accused's escape, or (2) the accused's resort to violence, or (3) the accused's disruption of the trial.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'Every court has power to preserve and enforce order in its immediate presence; to prevent interruption, disturbance, or hindrance to its proceedings; and to control all persons connected with a judicial proceeding before it.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'When there is no showing to the contrary, the presumption is always in favor of correct action on the part of the trial judge.' Ballard v. State , 236 Ala. 541 , 542 , 184 So. 260 (1938).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.