Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 555 SO2D 1282 - INTERGRAPH CORPORATION v. Stearman

INTERGRAPH CORPORATION v. Stearman’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2018

2 state decisions

40199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 520 So. 2d 37 - Kramer v. Piper Aircraft Corp. · 500 So. 2d 688 - Affiliates for Evaluation v. Viasyn Corp. · 221 So. 2d 454 - Brown v. Hall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[p]rivity is required in order to recover damages from the seller of a product for breach of express or implied warranties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.