Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 555 So. 2d 1331 - State v. Augustine

555 So. 2d 1331 - State v. Augustine’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

127
cited by 127 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

126 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 127 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 839 So. 2d 1 - State v. Smith (2003), 684 So. 2d 368 - State v. Seals (1996)

126 state decisions

540199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · State v. Jacobs · 422 So. 2d 123 - State v. Graham · Taliaferro v. Maryland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 127 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If a defendant is convicted of a felony, at least three days shall elapse between conviction and sentence. If a motion for a new trial, or in arrest of judgment, is filed, sentence shall not be imposed until at least twenty-four hours after the motion is overruled. If the defendant expressly waives a delay provided for in this article or pleads guilty, sentence may be imposed immediately.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. State v. Burnes · State v. Hicks
  2. “[a] sentence illegally imposed, even one not constitutionally excessive, is null, and constitutes no valid premise for continued incarceration. Furthermore, the district court (upon resentencing) is not bound by the sentence previously imposed, whereas this Court is bound by a legally imposed sentence which is not unconstitutionally excessive.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Williams · State v. Steines

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.