Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 555 SO2D 1355 - STATE, DOTD v. Dietrich

STATE, DOTD v. Dietrich’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 595 So. 2d 598 - State Through DOTD v. Chambers Inv. Co. (1992), 640 So. 2d 1258 - West Jefferson Levee D. v. Coast Quality (1994)

1 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

340199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Singleton v. Executive Officers of Atlas Construction Co. · 415 So. 2d 196 - State, Dept. of Highways v. Bitterwolf · City of Shreveport v. Standard Printing Co. of Shreveport, Inc. · State v. Foucha · 544 So. 2d 675 - STATE, DOTD v. Dietrich

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “compensated to the full extent of his loss”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Proof of economic loss may be determined by various methods, and it may exceed the market value of the property. However, the method employed for proof of loss must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that actual loss was sustained by the business because of the taking. In addition, the award may reflect the economic effect of protracted judicial proceedings. Constant . Where an expert's well-reasoned testimony supports an award of damages, where it is uncontradicted and, particularly, where it is accepted by the trier of fact, the property owners should prevail. City of Shreveport v. Standard Printing Co., 441 So.2d 737 (La.1983)." State, DOTD v. Dietrich, 555 So.2d 1355 , at page 1359 (La.1990).”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Article 1, § 4 does not specify how to fully compensate a landowner whose property is taken.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.