Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 555 So. 2d 192 - Ex Parte Brasher

555 So. 2d 192 - Ex Parte Brasher’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 2015

17 state decisions

1201989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alabama Pine Co. v. Merchants' & Farmers' Bank · Prince v. Hunter · Hildreth III v. State · Ex Parte Strickland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may also be construed as being permissive where the intent of the legislature would be defeated by making the language mandatory.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “" 'When determining whether "shall" is mandatory, "the prime object is to ascertain the legislative intent, as disclosed by all the terms and provisions of the act in relation to the subject of legislation and *Page 247 the general object intended to be accomplished." ' "”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.