555 So. 2d 21 - State v. Vincelli’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

19 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Inherent in the officer's right to stop an individual and to demand his name, address, and an explanation of his actions is the right to detain him temporarily to verify information given or to obtain information independently of his cooperation. State v. Fauria, 393 So.2d 688 (La.1981). `The results of the initial stop may arouse further suspicion or may dispel the questions in the officer's mind. If the latter is the case, the stop may go no further and the detained individual must be free to go. If, on the contrary, the officer's suspicions are confirmed or are further aroused, the stop may be prolonged and the scope enlarged as required by the circumstances.' 3 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 9.2(f) (2d printing 1978), p. 38 quoting from State v. Watson, 165 Conn. 577 , 345 A.2d 532 (1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 960 , 94 S.Ct. 1977 , 40 L.Ed.2d 311 (1974).”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Hebert · 594 So. 2d 404 - State v. Cabanas

2. “indicate[d] an intent to effect an extended restraint on [her] liberty.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Moreno · 594 So. 2d 404 - State v. Cabanas