Campbell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Radke v. State · United States v. Dupuy · 366 So. 2d 740 - Temple v. State · 52 Ala. App. 397 - Radke v. State · 507 So. 2d 558 - Korreckt v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellate courts have the `inherent authority to reverse a conviction while at the same time ordering an entry of judgment on a lesser included offense.' Edwards v. State , 452 So.2d 506 , 507 (Ala.Crim.App. 1983), aff'd , 452 So.2d 508 (Ala. 1984).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martinez v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.