555 So. 2d 285 - Brock v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
5
states following
November 2009
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 368 So. 2d 871 - Cumbo v. State · Skelton v. City of Birmingham · Wilson v. McCarthy · 475 So. 2d 623 - Ex Parte Stork · United States v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“adapted for the purposes of inflicting death or serious physical injury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]mpairment of physical condition or substantial pain.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“under § 13A-1-2 (8) when she hit her head on dresser and developed month-long headache). V The appellant contends that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury that resisting arrest is a lesser included offense of assault in the third degree. We agree based on the particular facts of this case. The appellant's indictments for third degree assault tracked the language of § 13A-6-22 (a)(4). Under subsection (a)(4), assault occurs when a person,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crear v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.