555 So. 2d 373 - Binger v. Binger’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 46 So. 2d 464 - Pawley v. Pawley · Pennsylvania ex rel. Master v. Baldi · 411 So. 2d 1334 - Wright v. Wright · 430 So. 2d 604 - Schroeder v. Schroeder · 217 So. 2d 573 - Brandt v. Brandt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Any person, whether or not a citizen or resident of this state, who personally or through an agent does any of the acts enumerated in this subsection thereby submits himself and, if he is a natural person, his personal representative to the jurisdiction of the court of this state for any cause of action arising from the doing of any of the following acts: ..... (e) With respect to a proceeding for alimony, child support, or division of property in connection with an action to dissolve a marriage or with respect to an independent action for support of dependents, maintaining a matrimonial domicile in this state at the time of the commencement of this action or, if the defendant resided in this state preceding the commencement of the action, whether cohabiting during that time or not. This paragraph does not change the residency requirement for filing an action for dissolution of marriage.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.