¶1AFFIRMED.
¶2concurring specially.
¶3I concur for the same reasons as expressed in the concurring opinion in Smith v. State, 554 So.2d 552 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
555 So. 2d 400
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 29, 1989
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-11-29
Relies on 554 So. 2d 552 - Smith v. State
Decided 1989-11-29
¶1AFFIRMED.
¶2concurring specially.
¶3I concur for the same reasons as expressed in the concurring opinion in Smith v. State, 554 So.2d 552 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).