Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 555 SO2D 478 - State v. Walland

State v. Walland’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2018

4 state decisions

201989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Berger v. United States · Rodriquez v. United States · Massler v. United States · In re Vendo Co. · Hearst v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Once the trial court granted a severance only one order of trials is equitably possi ble. Any other would frustrate the reason for the severance. Hart must be tried first so that he can testify at Latiolais’ subsequent trial. The District Attorney’s statutory authority to control the prosecution cannot supersede the defendant’s constitutional right to a fair trial, to present a •defense, and to call his witness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “subject to the supervision of the attorney general, as provided in Article 62, the district attorney has entire charge and control of every criminal prosecution instituted or pending in his district, and determines whom, when, and how he shall prosecute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]s to the order of trials, we agree with the district court's 1981 statement that among severed co-defendants, there is no absolute right to be tried in a certain order; each case must be evaluated on its own facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.