555 So. 2d 59 - Carr v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2010
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Hasting · 454 So. 2d 445 - Billiot v. State · King v. Mississippi · King v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the question propounded to the juror was (1) relevant to the voir dire examination; (2) . . . unambiguous; . . . (3) . . . the juror had substantial knowledge of the information sought to be elicited . . . [and (4)] prejudice . . . in selecting the jury could reasonably be inferred from the juror's failure to respond.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Myers v. State“[i]t is the duty of the court to ensure that a fair and impartial jury is empaneled.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The determination of whether a juror is fair and impartial is a judicial question”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bennett v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.