Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 555 So. 2d 888 - State v. Powers

555 So. 2d 888 - State v. Powers’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2014

16 state decisions

90199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · California v. Trombetta · Arizona v. Youngblood · 474 So. 2d 1193 - Ramsey v. State · 363 So. 2d 324 - State v. Sobel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Based upon the record presented to us, if the appellees’ performances had been video taped and the tape had not been preserved, we would affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the charges filed against the appellees without having to consider the good or bad faith of the sheriffs department. An accused’s due process rights are violated, irrespective of the good or bad faith of the prosecution, if the prosecution suppresses material evidence favorable to the accused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If we were to require the state in every case, in its investigation of a crime, to leave no stone unturned and preserve the evidence obtained in a manner satisfactorily only to the accused, it would shift the line of fairness between the rights of an accused and the rights of society totally to one side.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Law enforcement does not have a constitutional duty to perform any particular tests. Certain duties arise, however, once a policy of gathering evidence through certain tests is established. Once law enforcement has gathered and taken possession of evidence, a duty of preservation in some form attaches.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.