Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

555 So. 2d 982

Blocker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 31, 1990

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-01-31

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1990

1 state decisions

Relies on 519 So. 2d 618 - Mays v. State · 360 So. 2d 474 - DeCastro v. State · Clark v. Salisbury

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-01-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We find no abuse of discretion or harmful error in the trial court’s refusal to cause the testimony of one witness to be read back to the jury at the jury’s request. DeCastro v. State, 360 So.2d 474 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1978).

¶2We reverse the imposition of costs which were assessed without giving appellant notice or opportunity to be heard. Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Hernandez v. State, 547 So.2d 195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). We remand for a proper hearing with notice.

¶3AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, WALDEN and POLEN, JJ., concur.
/555/so2d/982 · .json · Public domain