Araiza v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2002
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roberts v. State · 167 Tex. Crim. 156 - Easley v. State · Burns v. State · 86 Tex. Crim. 243 - Davidson v. State · Clark v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under Article 21.08, Y.A.C.C.P. [sic], the state is free to allege ownership in either the actual owner of property or in another person who has the possession of the property. Thus, even if the proof showed that A was the title owner of the property, an allegation that B was the owner with proof that B had possession of the property at the time of the offense would present no variance and would be sufficient under the law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The state has the burden of proving ‘the allegation of ownership as laid in the indictment.’ Araiza, 555 S.W.2d at 746 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Flowers v. State“It does not alter the state’s burden to prove the facts that it does allege. Araiza, 555 S.W.2d at 747 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Flowers v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.