Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 556 F.2d 1352 - White v. Maggio

White v. Maggio’s Empirical Analysis

556 F.2d 1352 · 1977

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
5
states following
May 1999
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently May 1999 · most notably 479 So. 2d 76 - Ex Parte Grayson (1985), United States v. Valentine (1983)

17 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

190197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Gideon v. Wainwright · Bruton v. United States · United States v. Agurs · Stovall v. Denno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(f)undamental fairness is violated when a criminal defendant on trial for his liberty is denied the opportunity to have an expert of his choosing, bound by appropriate safeguards imposed by the Court, examine a piece of critical evidence whose nature is subject to varying expert opinion.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"`Critical evidence', for purposes of the due process clause, is evidence that, when developed by skilled counsel and experts, could induce a reasonable doubt in the minds of enough jurors to avoid a conviction." 556 F.2d at 1357-8 .”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““ ‘(a) the purpose to be served by the new standards, (b) the extent of the reliance by law enforcement authorities on the old standards, and (c) the effect on the administration of justice of a retroactive application of the new standards.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.