Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

556 F.2d 370

Docket No. 76-2146.

Wright v. Estelle

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1977-07-01

2 counsel of record

Relies on Wright v. Estelle

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1977-07-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2009

4 federal appellate ·

301977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

John W. Jennings, Atty., Staff Counsel for Inmates, Huntsville, Tex., for petitioner-appellant.

John L. Hill, Atty. Gen., Joe B. Dibrell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Chief Enforcement Div., David M. Kendall, Jr., First Asst. Atty. Gen., Richel Rivers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appellee.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion March 30, 1977, 5 Cir., 1977, 549 F.2d 971).

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

¶1

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶2

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

/556/f2d/370 · .json · Public domain