Irvington Moore, Division of U. S. Natural Resources, Inc. v. The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, Gem Top Manufacturing, Inc. v. The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor’s Empirical Analysis
556 F.2d 431 · 1977
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 2003 · most notably Diebold, Inc. v. Marshall (1978), 6 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1440, 1978 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 22,628 Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor (1978)
19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United States · Phillips v. Walling US · Austin v. New Hampshire
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“excluded from the requirements of this section”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“To strain the plain and natural meaning of words for the purpose of alleviating a perceived safety hazard is to delay the day when the occupational safety and health regulations will be written in clear and concise language so that employers will be better able to understand and observe them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Since in this case the Secretary's interpretation of his own regulations has been affirmed by the Commission, this interpretation must be accorded substantial weight.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.