Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 556 F.2d 602 - In Re James S. Nance, Bankrupt. Appeal of Coolidge Bank and Trust Company

In Re James S. Nance, Bankrupt. Appeal of Coolidge Bank and Trust Company’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2015

1 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

12019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co. · Tinker v. Colwell · Irving Trust Company v. Bowditch · McIntyre v. Kavanaugh · Huntington v. City of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘a willful disregard of what [he knew] to be his duty, an act which [was] against good morals and wrongful in and of itself, and which necessarily cause[d] inju ry and [was] done intentionally.’ Tinker v. Colwell, 193 U.S. 473, 487 , 24 S.Ct. 505, 509 , 48 L.Ed. 754 (1904). There need be no showing of “special malice” toward the injured party, only that the act “is done deliberately and intentionally in knowing disregard of the rights of another.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] willful and malicious injury does not follow as of course from every act of conversion, without reference to the circumstances ... There may be an honest, but mistaken belief, engendered in the course of dealing, that powers have been enlarged or incapacities removed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.