Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 556 F.2d 972 - Grosz v. Andrus

Grosz v. Andrus’s Empirical Analysis

556 F.2d 972 · 1977

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
March 2016
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Libby, McNeill, & Libby v. City National Bank (1978), Thos Gonzalez Corporation v. Consejo Nacional De Produccion De Costa Rica (1980)

36 federal appellate · 7 district ·

43019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2409A

Relies on Munro v. United States · M. O. S. Corp. v. John I. Haas Co. · 402 F. Supp. 1192 - Hatter v. United States · H-10 Water Taxi Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any civil action under this section shall be barred unless it is commenced within twelve years of the date upon which it accrued. Such action shall be deemed to have accrued on the date the plaintiff or his predecessor in interest knew or should have known of the claim of the United States.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “on any ground squarely presented on the record.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “To accept plaintiff’s reasoning that the 12-year limitation of suit contained in § 2409a(f) did not begin to run until October 25, 1972, would mean that all claims to quiet title against the United States, no matter how ancient, could be brought until October 26,1984. So broad a waiver of sovereign immunity is neither supportable in logic, nor by the Congressional history of § 2409a(f).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.