Ratnasingam v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
556 F.3d 10 · 2009
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Laeila Nelson Stephanie Nelson Phil Nelson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Ravindran v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Arevalo v. Ashcroft · Fesseha v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We uphold the BIA's findings if they are supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole, and will reverse only if any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“was not available and could not have been discovered or presented at the former hearing”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barsoum v. Holder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.