Rusakiewicz v. Lowe’s Empirical Analysis
556 F.3d 1095 · 2009
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 2022
4 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. Hall · 25 Cal. 3d 747 - Lackner v. LaCroix · OMI Holdings, Inc. v. Royal Insurance · Far West Capital, Inc. v. Towne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the burden on the defendant, (2) the forum state’s interest in resolving the dispute, (3) the plaintiffs interest in receiving convenient and effective relief, (4) the interstate judicial system’s interest in obtaining the most efficient resolution of controversies, and (5) the shared interest of the several states in furthering fundamental substantive social policies.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) the burden on the defendant, (2) the forum. state’s interest in resolving the dispute, (3) the plaintiffs interest in receiving convenient and effective relief, (4) the interstate judicial system’s inter est in obtaining the most efficient resolution of controversies, and (5) the shared interest of-the several states in furthering fundamental substantive ■ social policies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.