Anderson v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
556 F.3d 351 · 2009
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably Aponte-Rosario v. Acevedo-Vilá (2010), Future Proof Brands, L.L.C. v. Molson Coors Bevera (2020)
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1437P · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 3608 (§ 808 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968)) · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Alexander v. Sandoval · Gonzaga University v. Doe · Bowen v. Massachusetts · Blessing v. Freestone · United States v. Stanley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of the movant’s claims; (2) a substantial threat that movant will suffer irreparable injury if the injunction is not granted; (3) the threatened injury to the movant outweighs any harm that the other party might suffer if the injunction is entered; and (4) an injunction will not disserve the public interest.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the repeal of the provision added in 1987, combined with the text and structure of the current statute, makes it at least ambiguous as to whether Congress intended for the current version of § 1437p to create a federal right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“permits private individuals to sue state actors to enforce constitutional rights as well as rights created by federal statutes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.