Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 556 F.3d 484 - Everson v. Leis

Everson v. Leis’s Empirical Analysis

556 F.3d 484 · 2009

Citation profile

123
cited by 123 later decisions
2
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 123 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Alexander v. CareSource (2009), Coley v. Lucas County (2015)

12 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

1050200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Pearson v. Callahan · City of Canton v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 123 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he failure to present any evidence to counter a well-supported motion for summary judgment alone is grounds for granting the motion”). Finally, at oral argument, Shrivastava's counsel conceded that it was not her position that the complaints did not occur. .This recitation of undisputed facts includes certain instances of Shrivastava failing to meet her”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[G]overnment officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “cannot rest solely on the allegations made in [his] pleadings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.