Giles v. Wyeth, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
556 F.3d 596 · 2009
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
February 2015
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on 137 Ill. 2d 222 - Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co. · Murden v. Ercole · 213 Ill. App. 3d 390 - Northern Trust Co. v. Upjohn Co. · Mihailovich v. Laatsch · Baker v. IBP, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Court previously addressed this issue at a pretrial conference in this case — that prior ruling stands, and the Court sustains this objection pursuant to Rule 403. The question is misleading and any probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of confusion and unfair prejudice. As BP has repeatedly argued in this case (and the Court has held multiple times) whether Flint Hills knew the representations were true or false at the time of the sale is irrelevant to the breach of contract claims in this case. Flint Hills has not opened the door to this testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.