Huusko v. Jenkins’s Empirical Analysis
556 F.3d 633 · 2009
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2024
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Cuyler v. Sullivan · Estelle v. McGuire · Massaro v. United States · Day v. McDonough · Gilmore v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Federal law classifies a state proceeding for the purpose of § 2254....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Resendez v. Knight
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.