DeWeaver v. Runnels’s Empirical Analysis
556 F.3d 995 · 2009
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably State v. Morrisey (2009), Doody v. Ryan (2011)
8 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Williams v. Taylor · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Berkemer v. McCarty · Allen v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[B]ecause [Doody] filed his habeas petition after the effective date of the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), we must deny the petition unless the state court’s adjudication of [Doody’s] claims resulted in a decision that was either (1) contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States, or (2) based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doody v. Schriro · Doody v. Ryan“extends or fails to extend a clearly established legal principle to a new context in a way that is objectively unreasonable”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilson v. Knowles“was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilson v. Knowles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.