556 F. App'x 378 - Dice Corp. v. Bold Technologies’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 106 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 1201 (§ 103 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act) · 17 U.S.C. § 410 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 411 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act)
Relies on Foman v. Davis · Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co. · Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick · 176 L. Ed. 2d 18 - Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This court requires timely and reasoned presentation of non-jurisdictional issues to avoid forfeiture. It is well-settled that this court’s function is to review the case presented to the district court, rather than a better case fashioned after an unfavorable order. Arguments not squarely presented to the district court are not reviewed on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.