556 F. Supp. 16 - Kapp v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Plaintiff should have been provided the opportunity to have presented or prepared something in writing for the ALJ to consider in reaching his decision to apply res judicata. Furthermore, plaintiff should have been allowed to review the file and ascertain what documents he thought to be “new and material” evidence before that ALJ decided that there was no new and material evidence.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Broome v. Heckler

2. “This type of contention seems peculiarly apropos in the context of Social Security disability benefit proceedings in which, as here, the very disability that forms all or part of the basis for which the claimant seeks benefits may deprive her of the ability to understand or act upon notice of available administrative procedures.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Elchediak v. Heckler

3. “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 559 F. Supp. 1371 - Burbage v. Schweiker