556 F. Supp. 468 - Wright v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Miracle v. Celebrezze · LeMaster v. Weinberger · Ragan v. Finch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a physical or other mental impairment imposing additional and significant work-related limitation of function”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“additional and significant work-related limitations of function.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[h]aving met the Secretary's standards for a listed impairment, no further considerations of ... vocational factors need be made prior to a finding of disability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ambers v. Heckler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.