Kollar v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2018
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
Relies on Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company · Hammons v. State · Terry v. State · United States v. Brown · Lopez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[when the record indicates that the trial judge engaged in the evaluative processes but simply did not sufficiently articulate his reasons for enhancing sentence and the record indicates that the sentence imposed was not manifestly unreasonable, then the purposes underlying the specificity requirement have been satisfied.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a conviction of theft by false pretenses under IC 35-43-4-1(b)(4) requires a showing that misrepresentations as to past or present facts were made in order to gain possession of another's property”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Indiana's statute is patterned after the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Waldon v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.