State v. Tatum’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2018
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bloom v. Illinois · International Union, United Mine Workers v. Bagwell · Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. Feiock · Muniz v. Hoffman · Hopp v. Hopp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) disorderly, contemptuous, or insolent behavior, committed during the sitting of the court, in its immediate view and presence, and directly tending to interrupt its proceedings, or to impair the respect due to its authority; (2) behavior of like character in the presence of a referee, while actually engaged in a trial or hearing, pursuant to an order of court, or in the presence of a jury while actually sitting for the trial of a cause, or upon an inquest or other proceeding authorized by law; (8) breach of the peace, noise, or other disturbance directly tending to interrupt the proceedings of a court, jury, or referee; (4) willful disobedience to the lawful process or other mandate of a court other than the conduct described in subdivision 1; (5) resistance willfully offered to its lawful process or other mandate other than the conduct described in subdivision 1; (6) contumacious and unlawful refusal to be sworn as a witness, or, after being sworn, to answer any legal and proper interrogatory; (7) publication of a false or grossly inaccurate report of its proceedings; or (8) willful failure to pay court-ordered child support when the obligor has the ability to pay.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(2) a breach of the peace, boisterous conduct, or violent disturbance, tending to interrupt the business of the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Schloegl“tend[s] to interrupt the due course of a trial or other judicial proceedings”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Schloegl
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.