Holman v. Sorenson’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1990
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 11 Utah 2d 389 - Charlton v. Hackett · 92 Cal. App. 2d 23 - Bourke v. Frisk · 23 Utah 2d 1 - Keller v. Deseret Mortuary Company · 85 Okla. Crim. 45 - Wilson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no expert testimony at all in this case,” Call "brought in experts. They put in everything.” The trial court accurately anticipated the difficulty Manti would encounter as a result of its trial strategy: "What I’m saying is I think you put this Court in a very untenable position and if this case is appealed to the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals, I think you put them in an untenable position....’’ 3 . ”[B]reach of construction contract damages are based upon the total amount promised for the project, less the reasonable cost of completing it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.