Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 556 Pa. 10 - Commonwealth v. Rizzo

Commonwealth v. Rizzo’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Chestnut · Commonwealth v. Thompson · Commonwealth v. Graves

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At any time after the institution of a criminal proceedings, upon motion of any party, and after notice and hearing, the court may order the taking and preserving of the testimony of any witness who may be unavailable for trial or for any other proceeding, or when due to exceptional circumstances, it is in the interests of justice that the witness’ testimony be preserved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.