Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 556 So. 2d 1016 - Jefferson v. State

556 So. 2d 1016 - Jefferson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

127
cited by 127 later decisions
3
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

127 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 127 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 954 So. 2d 968 - Ross v. State (2007), Taylor v. State (1996)

127 state decisions

6401989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · 451 So. 2d 743 - Neal v. State · 422 So. 2d 737 - Evans v. State · 478 So. 2d 1017 - Harper v. State · Lee v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 127 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] guilty plea operates to waive the defendant's privilege against self-incrimination, the right to confront and cross-examine the prosecution's witnesses, the right to a jury trial and the right that the prosecution prove each element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[o]utside the constitutional realm, the law is settled that with only two exceptions, the entry of a knowing and voluntary guilty plea waives all other defects or insufficiencies in the indictment.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) to furnish the accused such a description of the charge against him as will enable him to make his defense and avail himself of his conviction or acquittal for protection against a further prosecution for the same cause, (2) to inform the court of the facts alleged so that it may decide whether they are sufficient in law to support a conviction if one should be obtained and (3) to guard against malicious, groundless prosecution.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.