Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 556 SO2D 1364 - Blue v. Schoen

Blue v. Schoen’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 2016

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

30199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Canter v. Koehring Company · 421 So. 2d 216 - Leenerts Farms, Inc. v. Rogers · Airco Refrigeration Service, Inc. v. Fink · 332 So. 2d 433 - Meador v. Toyota of Jefferson, Inc. · Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Ecodyne Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a).A lawyer’s fee shall be reasonable. The factors to be considered in determining the reasonableness of a fee include the following: (1)The time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the question involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly; (2) The likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of a particular employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer; (3) The fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services; (4) The amount involved and the results obtained; (5) The time limitations imposed by the client or by the circumstances; (6) The nature and length of the professional relationship with the client; h(7) The experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing the services; and (8) Whether the fee is fixed or contingent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.