Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 556 SO2D 147 - Ott v. Richard

Ott v. Richard’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 323 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 704

Relies on Commissioner v. Engle · 532 So. 2d 361 - Scarborough v. Duke · 417 So. 2d 425 - Jones v. Chrysler Credit Corp. · 263 So. 2d 436 - Johnson v. Best Manufacturing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the grounds of the objection pleaded by the peremptory exception may be removed by amendment of the petition, the judgment sustaining the exception shall order such amendment within the delay allowed by the court. If the grounds of the objection cannot be so removed, or if plaintiff fails to comply with the order to amend, the action shall be dismissed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.