Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 556 SO2D 248 - State v. Brown

State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2000
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · 448 So. 2d 676 - State v. Captville · State v. Prestridge · 354 So. 2d 1332 - State v. Schwartz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Fingerprint evidence standing alone is sufficient to sustain a conviction if, from the circumstances of the fingerprint, the finder of fact can determine that guilt is the only reasonable hypothesis. State v. Davenport, 445 So.2d 1190 (La.1984); State v. Wade, 467 So.2d 1191 (La.App. 2d Cir.1985). Circumstantial evidence supports a conviction when, upon viewing that evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational juror could have concluded that the alternative hypothesis of innocence was not sufficiently reasonable to preclude a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “assuming every fact to be proved that the evidence tends to prove, in order to convict, it must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.