Vena v. Vena’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 322 So. 2d 22 - Dinkel v. Dinkel · 497 So. 2d 635 - Pastore v. Pastore · 510 So. 2d 1023 - Iribar v. Iribar · 402 So. 2d 1351 - Whitney v. Whitney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The principal purpose of rehabilitative alimony is to establish the capacity for self-support of the receiving spouse, either through the redevelopment of previous skills or provision of the training necessary to develop potential supportive skills.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.