Frederick v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 1991
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 509 So. 2d 281 - State v. Rousseau · 530 So. 2d 53 - State v. Jones · 554 So. 2d 506 - State v. Simpson · 553 So. 2d 701 - Gibson v. State · 553 So. 2d 702 - Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under this rule, in the state-conceded absence of Frederick's involvement in a "continuing and persistent pattern of criminal activity" one which could not in any event arise when, as here, only two offenses are involved, ... the allegedly short period between his release and the present crime cannot alone support a guidelines deviation. In other words, proximity alone is no longer (if it ever were) enough; a sufficient pattern of criminal activity must also be demonstrated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Before the temporal proximity of the crimes can be considered as a valid reason for departure, it must be shown that the crimes committed demonstrate a defendant's involvement in a continuing and persistent pattern of criminal activity as evidenced by the timing of each offense in relation to prior offenses and the release from incarceration or other supervision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.