Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 556 So. 2d 690 - Grafe v. Olds

556 So. 2d 690 - Grafe v. Olds’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 2017

22 state decisions

140199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 467 So. 2d 657 - Bell v. City of Bay St. Louis · In Re the Adoption of Holman · Sims v. State · 473 So. 2d 174 - Bryant v. Cameron · Williams v. Pope

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he rights of a parent with reference to a child, including parental rights to control or withhold consent to an adoption, and the right to receive notice of a hearing on a petition for adoption, may be relinquished and the relationship of the parent and child terminated by the execution of a written voluntary release, signed by the parent, regardless of the age of the parent.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “This Court will not overturn a Chancellor's findings of fact when supported by substantial evidence unless an erroneous legal standard is applied or is manifestly wrong.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Absent a showing by the parent(s) establishing either fraud, duress, or undue influence by clear and convincing evidence, surrenders executed in strict compliance with the safeguard provision of § 93-17-9, supra, are irrevocable.... The statutory safeguards are themselves sufficient to guard against a hastily made decision.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.