Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 556 SW2D 922 - Salisbury v. Commonwealth

Salisbury v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2018

1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

5019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Wainwright v. Sykes · Fay v. Noia · Doyle v. Ohio · Estelle v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a defendant's attorney is aware of an issue and elects to raise no objection, the attorney's failure to object may constitute a waiver of an error having constitutional implications. In the absence of exceptional circumstances, a defendant is bound by the trial strategy adopted by his counsel even if made without prior consultation with the defendant. The defendant's counsel cannot deliberately forego making an objection to a curable trial defect when he is aware of the basis for an objection.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “determine whether the defendant's trial counsel failed to object as a matter of trial tactics, whether he deliberately withheld making an objection in the hopes that reversible error would slip into the record, or whether he was unaware that there was a possible objection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “an appellate court cannot hold that the trial judge erred in refusing to disqualify himself on the grounds of relationship.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.