International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, Agricultural Implement Workers v. United States Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission’s Empirical Analysis
557 F.2d 607 · 1977
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 558 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)
Relies on Califano v. Sanders · Helvering v. Hallock · Burnet v. Guggenheim · Parker v. Citizens Committee for the Hudson Valley · Citizens Committee for the Hudson Valley v. Volpe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any employee or representative of employees files a notice with the Secretary alleging that the period of time fixed in the citation for the abatement of the violation is unreasonable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. 8 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1422, 1980 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 24,509 Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, No. 79-1822 v. Sun Petroleum Products Co. And Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, Local 8-901 of Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, No. 79-1828 v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, Sun Petroleum Products and Secretary of Labor · Osh Oshd Marshall 79-1822 v. Sun Petroleum Products Co Local 8-901 of Oil Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union 79-1828“issue an order, based on findings of fact, affirming, modifying or vacating the Secretary's citation or proposed penalty, or directing other appropriate relief.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. 8 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1422, 1980 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 24,509 Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, No. 79-1822 v. Sun Petroleum Products Co. And Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, Local 8-901 of Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, No. 79-1828 v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, Sun Petroleum Products and Secretary of Labor · Osh Oshd Marshall 79-1822 v. Sun Petroleum Products Co Local 8-901 of Oil Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union 79-1828“that the period of time fixed in the citation for the abatement of the violation is unreasonable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. 8 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1422, 1980 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 24,509 Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, No. 79-1822 v. Sun Petroleum Products Co. And Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, Local 8-901 of Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, No. 79-1828 v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, Sun Petroleum Products and Secretary of Labor · Osh Oshd Marshall 79-1822 v. Sun Petroleum Products Co Local 8-901 of Oil Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union 79-1828
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.